Context and debate The German bomb

The race that was not

The German bomb

The Manhattan Project began in fear that Germany would build the bomb first. Germany had discovered fission, had some of the world’s best physicists, and started first. It never came close. This page sets out how far it got, why, and what its scientists said when they heard about Hiroshima.

Fission, discovered in Berlin

Nuclear fission was discovered in Germany. In December 1938 Otto Hahn and Fritz Strassmann, in their Berlin laboratory, found barium among the products of uranium bombarded with neutrons. Sources: 2

Lise Meitner, their colleague, had fled Berlin that summer. With Otto Frisch she explained the result and named it nuclear fission, in a paper published on 11 February 1939. Sources: 10

Hahn alone received the 1944 Nobel Prize in Chemistry. Historians who studied the Nobel committee’s records call the award controversial because Strassmann and Meitner were left out. Sources: 10 11 12

A wooden table in a museum case laid out with 1930s laboratory instruments, boxes, valves and wiring.
The fission table at the Deutsches Museum, Munich, now named after Hahn, Meitner and Strassmann. In 1938 the equipment was in three rooms; it was put on one table for display. J Brew, CC BY-SA 2.0, source

Fear of a German bomb

The Allied project began in fear. Einstein’s letter to Roosevelt of 2 August 1939 noted that Germany had stopped the sale of uranium from the Czech mines it had taken over. Sources: 13 14

In Britain in 1940, Otto Frisch and Rudolf Peierls warned that it was “quite conceivable that Germany is, in fact, developing this weapon.” Sources: 15

General Groves later explained the assumption the project worked on: “we had to assume that the most competent German scientists and engineers were working on an atomic program with the full support of their government”. Sources: 3

The Uranium Club

Germany started first. Kurt Diebner of the Army Ordnance Office held the first meeting of the Uranverein, the Uranium Club, on 16 September 1939. Werner Heisenberg was brought in for the theory of chain reactions. Sources: 3 4 16

The work was spread across institutes in Berlin, Hamburg, Leipzig, Heidelberg and the Army’s centre at Gottow, with “fierce competition over finite resources, bitter interpersonal rivalries, and ineffectual scientific management”. Sources: 17 18

It stayed small. One account puts it at “no more than a few dozen scientists scattered across the country”, against the thousands employed by the Manhattan Project. Sources: 16 19

Why Germany never built it

By the end of 1941 the scientists had shown that a reactor, a “uranium machine”, could work. Army Ordnance decided against an industrial effort. The historian Mark Walker calls this “the final verdict, which never was reassessed.” Sources: 4 17

In June 1942 Heisenberg told Albert Speer, the armaments minister, that a bomb could not be built before 1945 and would need large resources. Work on a reactor went on, but no bomb programme was ordered. Sources: 3 4 20

Heisenberg later made this meeting the turning point. Walker disagrees: “the decision to leave the research at the laboratory scale was made by Army Ordnance alone, more than half a year before the meeting with Speer.” Sources: 17

Heavy water and Vemork

Germany chose heavy water to slow the neutrons in its reactors. The world’s first industrial producer was the Norsk Hydro plant at Vemork, in occupied Norway. Sources: 6 17

On the night of 27 to 28 February 1943, Norwegian commandos of Operation Gunnerside crossed the gorge, entered the plant and blew up the heavy water cells, destroying about 500 kilograms of heavy water. No one was captured or killed. Sources: 5 6

Production restarted by May. An American bombing raid on 16 November 1943 killed 22 civilians when a bomb hit a shelter. Sources: 5 6

When the Germans moved the remaining stock, saboteurs sank the ferry Hydro on Lake Tinnsjø on 20 February 1944. Eighteen people were killed: 14 Norwegian civilians and 4 German soldiers. Sources: 5

The long stone building of the Vemork power station on a wooded hillside above the gorge near Rjukan.
The Vemork power station near Rjukan, now a museum, in 2018. The heavy water was made in the hydrogen factory nearby. Linus Folke Jensen, CC BY-SA 4.0, source

Haigerloch: the last reactor

In 1945 the Berlin reactor group moved south to a beer cellar in the small town of Haigerloch. Their last experiment, B-VIII, hung 664 cubes of uranium on chains in heavy water. Sources: 4 18 21

It never went critical. The scientists measured a neutron multiplication of about 6.7. Later modelling shows it would have needed about half as many cubes again. Sources: 18 21 22

There was no more uranium or heavy water to be had. About 400 more cubes sat with Diebner’s rival group, and together the two stocks would have been “more than enough” to reach criticality. Sources: 18 21

A reconstruction of the Haigerloch reactor, rows of dark metal cubes hanging on chains from a round lid above an open cylindrical pit.
The reconstruction of the B-VIII reactor in the Atomkeller Museum, Haigerloch, in 2013. LepoRello, CC BY-SA 3.0, source

How far each got

Germany set up its programme before the Allies, but went no further than the laboratory. Sources: 4 17

How far each programme got
MilestoneUS and BritainGermany
1A programme set upSources: 4 14October 1939September 1939
2An industrial effort approvedSources: 17 23August 1942Not reached
3A chain reaction in a reactorSources: 18 21 24 252 December 1942Not reached
4Plutonium made in a production reactorSources: 26 2726 September 1944Not reached
5A bomb testedSources: 28 2916 July 1945Not reached
6A bomb used (Little Boy, on Hiroshima)Sources: 30 316 August 1945Not reached

The Alsos mission

From the autumn of 1943 an American mission called Alsos followed the armies into Europe to find out how far Germany had got. Lieutenant Colonel Boris Pash commanded it, and the physicist Samuel Goudsmit led its scientists. Sources: 32

In November 1944, papers found at Strasbourg showed that the German programme had not got beyond research. Sources: 4 33

Alsos took Haigerloch on 23 April 1945 and dismantled the reactor the next day. The cubes had been buried in a field. Hechingen, where Heisenberg’s institute had moved, fell on 24 April. Sources: 4 18 32

Farm Hall

From 3 July 1945 to 3 January 1946, ten German nuclear scientists were held at Farm Hall, a country house at Godmanchester near Cambridge. Among them were Heisenberg, Hahn, von Weizsäcker and Diebner. Their rooms were bugged. Sources: 7 8 34

The transcripts of what they said were kept secret until 1992. These are three of the moments recorded after the news of Hiroshima. Sources: 9 35

  1. Date
    6 August 1945
    From
    Major T. H. Rittner, the British officer in charge
    To
    London, with a copy for General Groves
    Held at
    US National Archives, RG 77, and the UK National Archives

    Hahn hears the news

    he felt personally responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people, as it was his original discovery which had made the bomb possible.

    Rittner told Otto Hahn shortly before dinner, after the BBC announced the bomb. When Hahn told the others, they at first refused to believe it. Heisenberg said: “I don’t believe a word of the whole thing.”Sources: 7

  2. Date
    6 August 1945
    From
    The ten scientists at dinner and afterwards, recorded in secret
    Held at
    US National Archives, RG 77

    “We didn’t want to succeed”

    I believe the reason we didn’t do it was because all the physicists didn’t want to do it, on principle. If we had all wanted Germany to win the war we would have succeeded.

    Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker said this. Hahn answered: “I don’t believe that but I am thankful we didn’t succeed.” Later that night Erich Bagge said it was “absurd” for Weizsäcker to claim he had not wanted it to succeed: “That may be so in his case, but not for all of us.”Sources: 7 9 34

    How it is read

    • Jeremy Bernstein and David Cassidy see here the start of the “version” the German scientists told after the war.
    • Thomas Powers still cites the transcripts as evidence that Heisenberg found a way to say no.
  3. Date
    7 August 1945
    From
    Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker to Max von Laue
    Held at
    US National Archives, RG 77

    How history should remember it

    the peaceful development of the uranium engine was made in GERMANY under the HITLER regime, whereas the Americans and the English developed this ghastly weapon of war.

    The next day the ten agreed a memorandum saying that it “did not appear feasible at the time to produce a bomb with the technical possibilities available in Germany.”Sources: 7 9 34

    How it is read

    • Max von Laue wrote in 1959 that Weizsäcker led these talks, and “I did not hear the mention of any ethical point of view.”

That night Heisenberg put the critical mass at “about a ton”. A week later he gave his colleagues a lecture working out a far smaller figure. Bernstein and Cassidy found no “convincing evidence” that he had ever done the calculation before. Sources: 34 35

A three-storey red brick Georgian house behind a wall on a village street, with two cars parked in front.
Farm Hall, Godmanchester, in 2021. It is now divided into flats. Jonathan Thacker, CC BY-SA 2.0, source

The version they told

After the war the claim grew that the German scientists could have built a bomb but chose not to, on principle. Max von Laue called it the Lesart, the version. Sources: 9 34

Most historians reject it. The American Institute of Physics says the idea that Heisenberg joined the project to sabotage it is, in the opinion of most researchers, “not well supported”. Sources: 36

At the poles of the argument, Thomas Powers portrayed Heisenberg as a resister who denied Hitler the bomb, and Paul Lawrence Rose argued he was morally no better than the worst of the Nazis. Sources: 9

Copenhagen, 1941

In September 1941 Heisenberg visited Niels Bohr in occupied Copenhagen. No one else heard what they said on their walk. What is clear is that the military use of fission came up. Sources: 9 37

In 2002 the Bohr family released letters Bohr had drafted to Heisenberg but never sent. They show Bohr remembered the meeting very differently from Heisenberg’s later account. The archive warns that all were written sixteen years or more after the event. Sources: 9 38 39

Michael Frayn’s play Copenhagen, which opened at the National Theatre in London in 1998, brought the meeting to a wide audience. Sources: 9 40

The claim of a German test

In 2005 the historian Rainer Karlsch argued, from witness accounts and documents found in Russian archives, that a group under Kurt Diebner had tested a nuclear device in Thuringia in March 1945. Sources: 19 41

Germany’s national metrology institute, the PTB, analysed eight soil samples from the Ohrdruf training area and found no evidence of a nuclear explosion. It said a test would still have left traces its methods could detect, though it could not rule one out entirely. Sources: 42

Months after the book appeared, Karlsch revised his claims, saying there had been no large nuclear explosion and probably not even fission. He has gone on speaking on the subject, including at a 2025 seminar on the American and German bomb projects. Sources: 43 44

Japan’s programmes

Japan had two small programmes. The Army’s, known as Ni-Go, was led by Yoshio Nishina at RIKEN in Tokyo and authorised in April 1941. The Navy’s, F-Go, was led by Bunsaku Arakatsu at Kyoto. Sources: 45 46 47

Nishina’s group judged a bomb possible in theory but not in practice. Allied bombing destroyed its separation equipment in April 1945, and Nishina declared the project over in June. Japan never enriched enough uranium for a weapon. Sources: 45

In November 1945 the occupation authorities destroyed Japan’s cyclotrons, research machines, and dumped Nishina’s in Tokyo Bay. On 14 December the US Secretary of War said publicly that the order was “a mistake”. Sources: 45 46 48 49 50

U-234

In April 1945 the German submarine U-234 sailed from Norway for Japan, carrying a jet fighter, other weapons and about 1,200 pounds of uranium oxide. After Germany surrendered it gave itself up to the US Navy, and was brought into Portsmouth, New Hampshire, on 19 May 1945. Sources: 51 52 53

What became of the uranium is not known. The US Navy’s historians say it “may have been used in the Manhattan Project”, but that this is unconfirmed. Sources: 51 52 54

Several surrendered submarines moored side by side at a naval yard quay, with sailors and dockyard workers on their decks.
Surrendered German submarines at Portsmouth Navy Yard, New Hampshire, in May 1945. U-234 was among them. US Navy, First Naval District, Public domain (US government), source
Sources for this page54
  1. Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Newsletter 1/2014: the fission table. Checked 12 October 2026.
  2. US Department of Energy, Office of Scientific and Technical Information, The Discovery of Fission. Checked 12 October 2026.
  3. Atomic Heritage Foundation, German Atomic Bomb Project. Checked 12 October 2026.
  4. B. Cameron Reed, arXiv preprint, The German Nuclear Program: a review (arXiv 2001.09971). Checked 12 October 2026.
  5. Norsk Industriarbeidermuseum (Norwegian Industrial Workers Museum, Vemork), The heavy water operations. Checked 12 October 2026.
  6. Atomic Heritage Foundation, Operation Gunnerside. Checked 12 October 2026.
  7. German History in Documents and Images, German Historical Institute Washington, Transcript of surreptitiously taped conversations among German nuclear physicists at Farm Hall, 6 to 7 August 1945. Checked 12 October 2026.
  8. American Institute of Physics, Heisenberg web exhibit, Farm Hall Transcripts. Checked 12 October 2026.
  9. Ryan Dahn, Physics Today, 19 May 2022, The elusive truth of Farm Hall. Checked 12 October 2026.
  10. Elisabeth Crawford, Ruth Lewin Sime and Mark Walker, Physics Today, September 1997, A Nobel Tale of Postwar Injustice. Checked 12 October 2026.
  11. The Nobel Prize, The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1944. Checked 12 October 2026.
  12. The Nobel Prize, Nomination archive: Lise Meitner. Checked 12 October 2026.
  13. Atomic Heritage Foundation, Einstein-Szilard Letter. Checked 11 October 2026.
  14. US Department of Energy, Office of Scientific and Technical Information, Einstein's Letter, 1939. Checked 11 October 2026.
  15. Atomic Heritage Foundation, Frisch-Peierls Memorandum. Checked 12 October 2026.
  16. Christian Forstner, Physics in Perspective, 2022, The Uranverein: the German nuclear research programme. Checked 12 October 2026.
  17. Mark Walker, Physics Today, January 1990, Heisenberg, Goudsmit and the German Atomic Bomb. Checked 12 October 2026.
  18. Timothy Koeth and Miriam Hiebert, Physics Today, 2019, Tracking the journey of a uranium cube. Checked 12 October 2026.
  19. Rainer Karlsch and Mark Walker, Physics World, June 2005, New light on Hitler's bomb. Checked 12 October 2026.
  20. Heisenberg-Gesellschaft, The war years, 1939 to 1945. Checked 12 October 2026.
  21. Town of Haigerloch, Atomkeller Museum: the B8 experiment (in German). Checked 12 October 2026.
  22. G. Grasso and colleagues, Physics in Perspective, 2009, Neutronic analysis of the German experimental reactor B-VIII at Haigerloch. Checked 12 October 2026.
  23. US Department of Energy, Office of Scientific and Technical Information, Groves and the Manhattan Engineer District. Checked 11 October 2026.
  24. US Department of Energy, Office of Scientific and Technical Information, CP-1 Goes Critical. Checked 11 October 2026.
  25. University of Chicago News, The race for the first nuclear chain reaction. Checked 11 October 2026.
  26. US Department of Energy, The B Reactor National Historic Landmark (fact sheet). Checked 11 October 2026.
  27. US National Park Service, B Reactor. Checked 11 October 2026.
  28. US Army, Trinity Site 80th Anniversary Commemoration: The Test. Checked 11 October 2026.
  29. US Department of Energy, Office of Scientific and Technical Information, The Trinity Test. Checked 11 October 2026.
  30. US Department of Energy, Office of Scientific and Technical Information, The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima. Checked 11 October 2026.
  31. Atomic Heritage Foundation, Hiroshima and Nagasaki Bombing Timeline. Checked 11 October 2026.
  32. Atomic Heritage Foundation, The Alsos Mission. Checked 12 October 2026.
  33. US Department of Energy, Office of Scientific and Technical Information, Rival Programs: Germany and Japan. Checked 12 October 2026.
  34. Jeremy Bernstein and David Cassidy, Physics Today, August 1995, Bomb Apologetics: Farm Hall, August 1945. Checked 12 October 2026.
  35. Hans A. Bethe, Physics Today, July 2000, The German Uranium Project. Checked 12 October 2026.
  36. American Institute of Physics, Heisenberg web exhibit, Fission research. Checked 12 October 2026.
  37. David C. Cassidy, Physics Today, July 2000, A Historical Perspective on Copenhagen. Checked 12 October 2026.
  38. Niels Bohr Archive, Release of documents relating to the 1941 Bohr and Heisenberg meeting: introduction. Checked 12 October 2026.
  39. Bertram M. Schwarzschild, Physics Today, 2002, Bohr letters clarify mystery. Checked 12 October 2026.
  40. Victoria and Albert Museum, Poster for Copenhagen, National Theatre, 1998. Checked 12 October 2026.
  41. Physik Journal, Hitlers Bombe? Report of the German Physical Society event, July 2005 (in German). Checked 12 October 2026.
  42. Physik Journal, No evidence of a nuclear test at Ohrdruf, March 2006 (in German). Checked 12 October 2026.
  43. Gerald Wiemers, Neues Archiv für sächsische Geschichte 77, 2006, Review of Rainer Karlsch, Hitlers Bombe (in German). Checked 12 October 2026.
  44. Wilhelm und Else Heraeus-Stiftung, US-German WE-Heraeus-Seminar, Physikzentrum Bad Honnef, 1 to 6 June 2025, The American and the German Atomic Bomb Projects and Their Legacies: invited speakers. Checked 15 October 2026.
  45. Atomic Heritage Foundation, Japanese Atomic Bomb Project. Checked 12 October 2026.
  46. RIKEN, History of RIKEN (in Japanese). Checked 12 October 2026.
  47. A. Masaike, Kyoto University Archives, 31 October 2018, Kyoto University Archives Newsletter No. 35 (in Japanese). Checked 12 October 2026.
  48. Nishina Memorial Foundation, Dr Yoshio Nishina. Checked 12 October 2026.
  49. US Department of State, Office of the Historian, War Department to State Department, 29 December 1945 (FRUS 1945, vol. VI, document 754). Checked 12 October 2026.
  50. Michael Craddock, RIKEN Nishina Center, Nishina's cyclotrons (Nishina 120th anniversary lectures). Checked 12 October 2026.
  51. US Naval History and Heritage Command, H-Gram 033. Checked 12 October 2026.
  52. US Naval History and Heritage Command, H-Gram 047. Checked 12 October 2026.
  53. US Naval History and Heritage Command, Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships, Sutton (DE-771). Checked 12 October 2026.
  54. Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Health Physics Museum, U-234. Checked 12 October 2026.
Where sources differ5
  • Sources give the Speer meeting as 4 June 1942 (Heisenberg-Gesellschaft) or 6 June 1942 (Reed).
  • The Atomkeller Museum rounds the multiplication to about 7; the German scientists' own figure was 6.7. The museum's main page says the chain reaction got going, but its own page on the experiment, and every other source, says the reactor did not go critical.
  • The Department of Energy fact sheet and the National Park Service give the night of 26 September 1944. Other Department of Energy and Atomic Heritage Foundation pages say it was in the early hours of 27 September.
  • Sources differ on when F-Go began: the Atomic Heritage Foundation says the Navy approached Arakatsu in 1942; Kyoto University Archives say the request came in the autumn of 1944.
  • The US Navy's histories give 1,210 or 1,200 pounds of uranium oxide; a 1997 museum article gives 560 kg.

Checked against its sources on 13 October 2026.